Do enough people currently, *actively* use the term "multimedia" to mean "contains multiple fandoms," that it should be one of the term's major definitions on fanlore?
No.
Therefore, should it instead be briefly noted as an alternate historical usage on the main "multifandom" page, which should be renamed "multifandom" and not "multifandom or multimedia," since "multimedia" is not actually in current widespread use?
Yes.
If someone wants to argue that it *is* a term in current, widespread use, [citation needed].
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 05:47 am (UTC)Do enough people currently, *actively* use the term "multimedia" to mean "contains multiple fandoms," that it should be one of the term's major definitions on fanlore?
No.
Therefore, should it instead be briefly noted as an alternate historical usage on the main "multifandom" page, which should be renamed "multifandom" and not "multifandom or multimedia," since "multimedia" is not actually in current widespread use?
Yes.
If someone wants to argue that it *is* a term in current, widespread use, [citation needed].